查看: 2550|回复: 10

美国FDA调整青霉素对肺炎链球菌折点

[复制链接]

9万

主题

9万

帖子

9万

积分

管理员

Rank: 9Rank: 9Rank: 9

积分
96798
发表于 2008-5-2 22:50:00 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式


size=3]Penicillin’s Back: FDA Raises Breakpoints for S. pneumoniae Pneumonia
青霉素又回来了!美国FDA提高了青霉素对肺炎链球菌的折点,CLSI于去年6月接受了这个调整,新的CLSI文件于2008年1月发布,不知何时能到手噢!
Penicillin, one of the safest and most effective drugs for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, is back in the armamentarium following action by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and pressure from IDSA and several key members.
FDA has raised the concentration at which S. pneumoniae is considered susceptible to penicillin, according to an amended package insert for Baxter Healthcare Corporation’s penicillin G approved by FDA and obtained by IDSA. The breakpoint changes are:
 Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) (mcg/mL) Susceptible (S)Intermediate (I)Resistant (R)Updated≤2 4≥8Previous ≤0.060.12-1.0≥2
The susceptible breakpoint for meningitis caused by S. pneumoniae remains unchanged (0.06 mcg/mL). The package insert is available online from FDA’s website.
Evidence has been mounting for years that penicillin is effective against pneumococcal pneumonia at concentrations that would fail for meningitis or otitis media. Victor L. Yu, MD, FIDSA, co-authored one significant study in Clinical Infectious Diseases in 2003 looking at patients with pneumococcal bacteremia who were initially treated with penicillin before laboratory tests came back resistant. “It turned out they uniformly did fine,” Dr. Yu said. The study won IDSA’s Emmanuel Wolinsky Award in 2003. Since then, several other studies have been published showing penicillin is effective against pneumococcal pneumonia at concentrations that would fail for other diseases.
IDSA strongly supported legislation passed last fall that requires FDA to update antimicrobial breakpoints. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) adopted the revised breakpoints in June 2007 and published them in January 2008.  CLSI also supported a citizens’ petition written by Dr. Yu and others urging FDA to raise the penicillin breakpoints by submitting two “citizens petitions” of its own. Dr. Yu learned this month that FDA had signed an approval letter for Baxter’s amended package insert on March 1. “This was a case where FDA acted expeditiously,” Dr. Yu said.
Although a formal response from the FDA to Dr. Yu’s group and CLSI has not yet been received and the package inserts of other generic penicillins have not yet been changed, “the implication of the FDA’s action is that all of the package inserts for generic penicillins should be changed and that microbiology laboratories and clinicians should feel comfortable using the revised breakpoints to guide therapy for pneumococcal infections,” said Melvin P. Weinstein, MD, FIDSA, IDSA’s liaison to CLSI.
This is good news, Dr. Yu said, because now that quinolones have become the standard therapy for community-acquired pneumonia, reports of quinolone failures are on the rise. “You use it and you lose it,” he said.
“People laughed at me when I said I would bring back penicillin,” Dr. Yu said. But, he added, it will take some time and some effort for penicillin to really make a comeback. As empiric therapy has taken over, he said, clinicians and laboratories have lost the skills and the tools to diagnose the causes of CAP. “If anyone should be delighted, it should be infectious diseases specialists, because the skill of making a diagnosis returns. But because the practice of giving empiric therapy without thinking has become so inculcated in the last seven years, I think it’s going to take publicity to go back to what we were so good at.”





上一篇:这些观点,你能接受多少?下一篇:持续性质量改进与临床的沟通





[h2]评分[/h2]





参与人数 1 +10

收起
理由





楚楚
+ 10
新信息!




查看全部评分


回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

527

帖子

14

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
14
发表于 2008-5-2 22:50:01 | 显示全部楼层


霉素又回来了!美国FDA提高了青霉素对肺炎链球菌的折点,CLSI于去年6月接受了这个调整,新的CLSI文件于2008年1月发布,不知何时能
微生物之家论坛已有老师提供2008版的CLSI,欢迎去下载!








回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

1954

帖子

34

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
34
发表于 2008-5-2 22:50:02 | 显示全部楼层


该标准分成了三部分:非脑膜炎来源标本、脑膜炎标本、以及口服青霉素分别有不同解释标准。







登录/注册后可看大图





2008年CLSI肺炎球菌解释标准.JPG (197.68 KB, 下载次数: 3)

下载附件

 保存到相册



2008-5-3 17:20 上传









回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

711

帖子

700

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
700
发表于 2008-5-2 22:50:03 | 显示全部楼层
[h1]回复 #1 木瓜 的帖子[/h1]


中文版估计5月底将会面世。到时第一时间上传!:lol






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

185

帖子

449

积分

中级会员

Rank: 3Rank: 3

积分
449
发表于 2008-5-2 22:50:04 | 显示全部楼层

原帖由 野渡无人 于 2008-5-3 23:02 发表
                               
登录/注册后可看大图

中文版估计5月底将会面世。到时第一时间上传!:lol
往年都是孙长贵老师翻译,不知今年他还有没有时间.他太忙了.






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

711

帖子

700

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
700
发表于 2008-5-2 22:50:05 | 显示全部楼层
[h1]回复 #5 薇荷 的帖子[/h1]


估计五月底吧!:lol






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

372

帖子

900

积分

高级会员

Rank: 4

积分
900
发表于 2008-5-2 22:50:06 | 显示全部楼层
[h1]回复 #4 野渡无人 的帖子[/h1]


期待着!先谢过!:ketou :ketou






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

662

帖子

54

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
54
发表于 2008-5-2 22:50:07 | 显示全部楼层
[h1]请问各位大师[/h1]


青霉素对肺炎链球菌的折点调整以后,青霉素、阿莫西林等对于肺炎链球菌肺炎的疗效如何?
我指的是原来判断为中介现在判断敏感,原来判断耐药现在判断中介的菌株。
:favav 急切想知道!谢谢!

[ 本帖最后由 gjs661 于 2009-2-6 22:47 编辑 ]






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

1954

帖子

34

积分

新手上路

Rank: 1

积分
34
发表于 2008-5-2 22:50:08 | 显示全部楼层


与细菌对药物的敏感性无关,只是说我们对于自然科学的认识又进步一点而已。更新后,我们发出错误报告的几率就降低了。
    需要清楚的是,即是现在最权威的CLSI也不能保证所有规则都是完全科学和可靠的,所以才会每年更新。每更新一次,我们就越接近临床真实情况一步。
    更应该清楚的是,我们的报告几乎随时都存在错误,有些通过现有的质量控制措施是可以避免的,而有些是随着研究的深入和认识的加深慢慢减少的。






回复

使用道具 举报

0

主题

662

帖子

54

积分

注册会员

Rank: 2

积分
54
发表于 2008-5-2 22:50:09 | 显示全部楼层


巴版的回复看了好几遍没大理解——“发出错误报告的几率降低”。
这种错误与正确如果不是与治疗效果判断,是以什么判断?






回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|手机版|小黑屋|(浙ICP备16040142号-3)|山东省消毒供应质量控制中心

Powered by Discuz! X3.4© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表